Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 9:59:46 GMT
To Begin With, There Are Few Political Parties Founded by a Charismatic Leader That Have Managed to Survive Prolonged Exile or the Death of the Founder. Peronism Did It Doubly: First It Survived Years of Banning, Exile of Its Leader and Persecution of Its Militants Between and , Then, the Death of Perón in , and Shortly After, Seven More Years of Violent Repression Under the Last Military Dictatorship (-). The Explanations for the Survival of Peronism Emphasize the Capacity for Organization and Resilience of Various Actors at the Base of the Movement: the.
Unions (Analyzed by Daniel James), the Relatively and Provincial Leaders of the Provinces (Studied by Ana María Mustapic), the Decentralized Territorial Militancy (Portrayed by Levitsky Himself) and the Youth Groups That Massively Joined Peronism in the S. That is, the Sectors UK Mobile Database That Allowed Peronism to Survive Without Perón and That Give It Vitality Even Today Are the Same Ones That Strain the Internal Life of the Frente De Todos. These Tensions, Historically, Have Been Resolved by Leadership. Peronism Was Born as a Movement Linked to a Charismatic Leadership That Managed to Survive the Death of Its Original Leader. This is Unusual, but Not Impossible.
The Curious Thing is That It Has Survived Without Becoming Completely Bureaucratized, That It Has Preserved a Kind of Serial Need for Charisma. The Literature on Parties Assumes That, in Those Cases in Which a Charismatic Party Manages to Transition Towards an Institutionalized Party Format, It Will Do So by Transforming Into a Grayer, More Procedural Organization, Managed by Bureaucrats. This is What Max Weber, Creator of Both the Concept of Charisma and Bureaucratization , Says . Weber Compares Modern Parties With the Catholic Church.
Unions (Analyzed by Daniel James), the Relatively and Provincial Leaders of the Provinces (Studied by Ana María Mustapic), the Decentralized Territorial Militancy (Portrayed by Levitsky Himself) and the Youth Groups That Massively Joined Peronism in the S. That is, the Sectors UK Mobile Database That Allowed Peronism to Survive Without Perón and That Give It Vitality Even Today Are the Same Ones That Strain the Internal Life of the Frente De Todos. These Tensions, Historically, Have Been Resolved by Leadership. Peronism Was Born as a Movement Linked to a Charismatic Leadership That Managed to Survive the Death of Its Original Leader. This is Unusual, but Not Impossible.
The Curious Thing is That It Has Survived Without Becoming Completely Bureaucratized, That It Has Preserved a Kind of Serial Need for Charisma. The Literature on Parties Assumes That, in Those Cases in Which a Charismatic Party Manages to Transition Towards an Institutionalized Party Format, It Will Do So by Transforming Into a Grayer, More Procedural Organization, Managed by Bureaucrats. This is What Max Weber, Creator of Both the Concept of Charisma and Bureaucratization , Says . Weber Compares Modern Parties With the Catholic Church.
