Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 3:09:51 GMT
We live with her. Electromagnetic radiation emanates from devices such as radios, computers and ovens that we use daily. But which ones emit what? And what risks do they involve? Here's a quick guide. Let's start with the basics. The definition, according to the Royal Spanish Academy. Radiation Wave energy or material particles that propagate through space. Electromagnetic wave, or wave Way of propagating through space the electromagnetic fields produced by moving electric charges and which, depending on their frequency range, receive special names; for example, radio waves, microwaves, light waves, X-rays, gamma rays, etc. The light we see is a wave of vibrating electric and magnetic fields
The answer is not clear. It is a debate that is still very open and it is not clear who should make the decision,” says Ramón López de , director of the Artificial America Mobile Number List Intelligence Research Institute of the CSIC. And he asks: "Should governments, manufacturers, consumers decide it?" According to the Science study, people do not want the Government to force cars to have that utilitarian spirit that leads them to choose the death of the passenger. The large automated transportation corporations (Uber, Google, Volvo, Ford have already organized together in a powerful lobby to influence the political decisions that are yet to come. López de suggests that perhaps these cars will be able to autonomously learn their own moral criteria, since artificial intelligence will be more developed by the time fully autonomous vehicles arrive, called level 5. "It would create another problem: they would leave the factory the same but every one would evolve one's ethical choices differently," he points out. In any case, he demands absolute transparency.
Something that may not reassure the consumer much either in light of what happened with the automobile emissions scandal. Why do we consider the morality of smart cars and not other intelligent machines? López de believes that artificial intelligence, when it has complete autonomy, should always be regulated according to moral criteria. And he cites future smart weapons or the bots that play autonomously on the stock market today: "They should be controlled now, from above." If a car must have a moral criterion to run over this or those people, why shouldn't an intelligent robot have a moral criterion to refuse to work for an exploitative businessman or a supercomputer refuse to defraud money? The cars of the future may be interchangeable, ownerless units in large transportation systems, like today's subway cars, proposes Joshua Greene, a specialist in these moral judgments at Harvard University, in another article in Science.
The answer is not clear. It is a debate that is still very open and it is not clear who should make the decision,” says Ramón López de , director of the Artificial America Mobile Number List Intelligence Research Institute of the CSIC. And he asks: "Should governments, manufacturers, consumers decide it?" According to the Science study, people do not want the Government to force cars to have that utilitarian spirit that leads them to choose the death of the passenger. The large automated transportation corporations (Uber, Google, Volvo, Ford have already organized together in a powerful lobby to influence the political decisions that are yet to come. López de suggests that perhaps these cars will be able to autonomously learn their own moral criteria, since artificial intelligence will be more developed by the time fully autonomous vehicles arrive, called level 5. "It would create another problem: they would leave the factory the same but every one would evolve one's ethical choices differently," he points out. In any case, he demands absolute transparency.
Something that may not reassure the consumer much either in light of what happened with the automobile emissions scandal. Why do we consider the morality of smart cars and not other intelligent machines? López de believes that artificial intelligence, when it has complete autonomy, should always be regulated according to moral criteria. And he cites future smart weapons or the bots that play autonomously on the stock market today: "They should be controlled now, from above." If a car must have a moral criterion to run over this or those people, why shouldn't an intelligent robot have a moral criterion to refuse to work for an exploitative businessman or a supercomputer refuse to defraud money? The cars of the future may be interchangeable, ownerless units in large transportation systems, like today's subway cars, proposes Joshua Greene, a specialist in these moral judgments at Harvard University, in another article in Science.
